WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS ahead for Black Bag.
Those who watchBlack Bagmay wish to keep a pen and paper close by to make sense of its serpentine ending. Marketed as an action thriller,Black Bagis more of a psychological puzzle of cloaks and daggers – or should I say steak knives – that requires viewers' full focus to piece together. Given its swift 93-minute runtime,Black Bagrequires much more of your attention than your time, packing in a flurry of dialogue-driven exposition and twists that can make one’s head spin by its end. Those who dig to keep up, however, are rewarded by itsrelentlessly sharp pace.
Black Bagis Steven Soderbergh and David Koepp’s latest collaboration and second feature film of 2025, following theirpsychological horrorPresence. The film is a sleek and sexually charged cat-and-mouse game full of professional liars, some better than others. Michael Fassbender, who has a recent knack for playing robotic agents and killers with flat affects (The Agency,The Killer), leads the ensemblecast ofBlack Bagalongside the alluring and cold-as-ice Cate Blanchett. Their George and Kathryn are a married couple working forLondon’s National Cyber Security Centre, whose dangerous cyber weapon “Severus” has been leakedinto Russian hands.
Who Leaked Severus & Betrayed The National Cyber Security Centre
The Leak Came All The Way From The Top
The Severus leak came from the top of the National Cyber Security Centre – Pierce Brosnan’s Arthur Stieglitz.Arthur enlisted the help of Col. James Stokes, the second in command to George Woodhouse, to leak Severus into Russian handswith the intention of inspiring some controlled chaos. Severus is an advanced and top-secret cyber weapon that has the unique ability to melt down any nuclear reactor core. It was the most prized possession of the NCSC, which makes it quite astonishing that Arthur would want to put it in enemy hands. Ultimately, Arthur and Stokes are the key villains and traitors behind the leak.
James Stokes’ Deception & Ideological Motivations Explained
Stokes Believed In Sacrificing Some For The Greater Good
Like the other mole suspects given to George by another high-ranking NCSC official, Philip Meacham, James Stokes is a highly intelligent and sophisticated liar. He differs from the rest in his ideological beliefs, as exemplified by the question George asks him during his polygraph test towards the end of the film. George questions whether it is morally acceptable to kill someone for the greater good, which is exactly what Stokes believes.He wanted to leak Severus as bait for the Russians to start a world war, justifying the extreme intervention of the Western military forces, thus “ending” the war (presumably in Ukraine).
Margaret Langford & The $7 Million Bank Account Explained
Stokes Lied To George To Place Heat On Kathryn
Stokes deceives George by intentionally raising his suspicions against Kathryn. He tells him that Kathryn used an antiquated alias, “Margaret Langfor,d” to open a bank account in Myanmar with $7 million deposited in a lump sum.This led George to suspect that Kathryn sold Severus to the Russians– Andrei Kulikov, whom she met on the bench in Zurich, and Vadim Pavlichuk, a Russian general on house arrest who escaped as George redirected satellite surveillance on Kathryn. Stokes later reveals that he was incorrect about Kathryn being the only one to use the alias, which is why George nearly kills him on the fishing boat.
How Pierce Brosnan’s Arthur Was Involved In The Severus Leak
He Enlisted The Ideological Stokes To Do His Dirty Work
Arthur is the shadowy spearhead of the Severus leak who set up the “plan” and “counter-plan” to make George and Kathryn suspicious of each other. Arthur is also likely responsible for killing Meacham, even though it was Stokes who actually poisoned him. All the resultingactions of Stokes, Zoe, Freddie, and Clarissa were ripples of the skipping stone that Arthur cast. Arthur did not want George to find out that Stokes leaked Severus on his orders, so he deployed a defensive plan that would manipulate George into believing Kathryn was the mole. Arthur severely underestimated the bond and trust between George and Kathryn.
George’s “Plan” & Kathryn’s “Counter-Plan” Explained
Arthur Wanted George & Kathryn At Odds To Avoid Detection
Arthur’s initial plan was to make George suspicious of Kathryn, which he did successfully by having a movie stub for “Dark Windows” planted in their bedroom trash can. When George asked Kathryn if she wanted to see the film, she acted like she had never seen it before (which she genuinely hadn’t). George suspected that she secretly met with someone in the theater and was being dishonest about her schedule. Thisled George to snoop on her calendar, discover the coordinates for the Zurich meetup, and redirect the satellite so that Pavlichuk could escape and George would be convinced that Kathryn was the mole.
Black Bag Review: Thank You, Steven Soderbergh, For Bringing Back The Sexy Spy Thriller
There is enough intensity and drama between its core characters to make for a wildly entertaining, tense and, dare I say it, sexy thriller.
The counter-plan was to have Freddie tell Kathryn that George was spying on her in Zurich, which would raise her suspicions of him. This is exactly what he did the night she returned from Switzerland.It was all designed to have George and Kathryn turn on each other, which was the only way that Arthur and Stokes could get away with the Severus leak.
What The Russians Were Going To Do With Severus
Pavlichuk & Kulikov Were Seemingly Hired By Arthur & Stokes
Arthur and Stokes wanted two Russian criminals – Pavlichuk and Kulikov – to use Severus to initiate meltdowns of one or more nuclear reactor cores outside Moscow. This would have greatly exposed Russian citizens to radiation, who are apparently the “10,000 to 20,000” innocent people whose lives were at stake if Severus was deployed. Itappears that Pavlichuk and Kulikov were planning to carry out a terrorist attack against their own country using Severus, which could have “ended the war”, presumably between Russia and Ukraine. The $7 million under Margaret Langford might have been Pavlichuk and Kulikov’s payment – if Kathryn hadn’t tipped off the CIA, who bombed their car.
Why George Didn’t Kill Freddie, Zoe & Clarissa
They Were Pawns In Arthur & Stokes' Scheme
Once Stokes admitted to betraying George, setting up Kathryn, and leaking Severus at the second dinner party at the Woodhouse residence, he panicked and tried to kill George. While intelligent, Stokes actually believed that Kathryn put a loaded gun on the table, which ended up being a fatal mistake.George captured Stokes' confession on a hidden cameraand began negotiating the terms of his surrender. Once he fires two blanks at George, Kathryn pulls out an actually loaded gun and shoots Stokes dead.
Freddie, Zoe, and Clarissa were involved in Arthur’s elaborate scheme but to varying and lesser degrees.
Freddie, Zoe, and Clarissa were involved in Arthur’s elaborate scheme, but to varying and lesser degrees. Zoe only knew about Severus because Stokes, her ex-boyfriend, rambled about it one night in private while he was drunk. Zoe told Freddie, whom she was secretly having an affair with for the last 2 months, about Severus. Freddie’s affection for Zoe led him to ask his actual girlfriend, the newbie Clarissa, to plant the movie ticket stub in George and Kathryn’s bedroom wastebasket. Sincethey were all pawns in Arthur and Stokes' plot, George spared their lives.
The Real Meaning of Black Bag’s Ending
Trust No One – Except Your Spouse
Black Bagis a whirlwind of plot twists and revealed deceptions that rest on a simple concept: trust no one (except your spouse). While Soderbergh and Koepp arguably should have allowed a few breaths in their rapid-fire film, the tension they establish and hold is gripping and makes for a fascinating “he said, she said,” until the human lie detector George sets the record straight. Similar tomurder mysteries likeKnives Out,Black Bagkeeps you guessing about the guilty party up until its final momentsand thoroughly entertains with a fantastic ensemble cast.
Black Bag proves that the sanctity of marriage still applies in even the deadliest of circles.
Black Bagrevels in a near-paranoid mindset that questions everything and everyone, which would sound unhinged if it weren’t for its setting. The film is inherently about deception and how even the best liars will eventually find it hard to keep track of their tricks. There are intriguing philosophical elements that are important to the story but blown through rather quickly given its incredibly lean runtime.Black Bagmay be worth watching twice to gain a complete grasp on the entirety of its plot. If anything, it proves that the sanctity of marriage still applies in even the deadliest of circles.
How The Black Bag Ending Was Received
Critics Loved The Film & Its Ending
A twisty spy movie likeBlack Baglives and dies by its ending, and thankfully, the conclusion of the Steven Soderbergh movie more than delivered.Critics gaveBlack Baga hugely impressive 96% on Rotten Tomatoes, a score the movie never would have achieved if it had a weak ending. Not only did the pundits love the film’s final moments, but they also sawBlack Bagas a rallying cry for shorter movies in an industry full of bloated runtimes. Kyle Smith of theWall Street Journalsaid,
Mr. Koepp and Mr. Soderbergh remind us of one advantage that remains with features: the ability to bring a story to a rapid and satisfying ending. Lasting 93 minutes instead of 93 episodes, Black Bag snaps closed with a rewarding click.
While some audience members found the ending to be a rapid-fire exposition overload, for the most part, viewers agreed with the critics on the success of bothBlack Bag’s swift runtime and conclusion. In aRedditdiscussion about the movie,shaneo632summed it up best by saying,
Gimme more of these 93 minute 7/10 movies with no f***ing fat on them that just get to the point while having really tasty dialogue and performances.
I love how the film just ends the nanosecond it’s said everything it wants to.
